Brutalism in Berlin
Raw concrete. Monumental forms. Buildings that refuse to disappear into the background. Explore the bold and sometimes controversial architecture of Berlin.
What makes a building brutalist?
Before watching, discuss these questions. Think about the materials, shapes and atmosphere of the buildings you know.
Make a prediction: What kind of buildings do you expect to see in a video about Brutalism in Berlin?
Brutalist architecture in Berlin
Watch the video and choose the best answer. The exercise has its own scroll bar, so you can move through the questions while keeping the video beside it.
Watch the video
First watch: focus on the buildings and the speaker's opinions. Second watch: answer the questions.
Listening comprehension
Choose one answer for each question.
Topic takeaways
- Brutalism emphasizes raw materials, strong forms and visible construction.
- The Mäusebunker is a striking example of organic Brutalist architecture in Berlin.
- St. Agnes Church uses monumental form and minimal decoration to create a space for reflection.
- Not every building described as Brutalist has exposed concrete.
- Preserving Brutalist buildings is an important part of protecting Berlin's architectural history.
Listening note: The questions follow the supplied video transcript. Some automatic-caption spellings have been normalized for clarity (for example, "shotcrete" and "formwork marks").
Berlin's concrete landmarks
Look closely at the buildings. Notice the shapes, surfaces, openings and relationship between the structure and its surroundings.
Former central animal laboratories. Designed by Gerd and Magdalena Hänska; completed in 1981. Photo: Cordhg, CC BY-SA 4.0. Image and license.
Designed by Werner Düttmann and built between 1964 and 1967. Photo: Regani, public domain. Image and license.
A distinctive tower designed by Ralf Schüler and Ursulina Schüler-Witte. Photo: Fred Romero, CC BY 2.0. Image and license.
A major post-war modernist cinema on Karl-Marx-Allee. Photo: Mabit1, CC BY-SA 4.0. Image and license.
The video also discusses an eastern Berlin interior whose name is not clearly identified in the supplied transcript. The gallery therefore uses other identifiable Berlin examples rather than guessing its identity.
Brutalism: architecture without disguise
Brutalism is one of the most recognizable architectural movements of the twentieth century. It became especially influential from the 1950s through the 1970s. Its name comes from the French expression béton brut, meaning "raw concrete." The term does not mean that the buildings are necessarily brutal or violent. Instead, it refers to an approach in which materials and construction are allowed to remain visible.
Brutalist buildings often have massive geometric forms, repetitive patterns, deep shadows and exposed structural elements. Concrete is frequently used, but the movement is not simply about using concrete. It is also about expressing how a building works. Rather than hiding pipes, supports or structural systems behind decorative surfaces, architects may make these elements part of the design.
Berlin is an especially interesting city for exploring this architecture. After the Second World War, the city was divided into East and West. The two political systems developed different approaches to public buildings, housing and urban planning. Modern architecture became part of the way each side represented its ideas about society and the future.
One of Berlin's most unusual buildings is the Mäusebunker in Steglitz. It was designed by Gerd and Magdalena Hänska as a central animal research laboratory. Planning began in the 1960s, construction took place mainly between 1971 and 1981, and the building was completed in 1981. Its exterior is covered with dramatic concrete forms, ventilation structures and unusual openings. The result has often been compared to a battleship or a science-fiction spacecraft.
The building's appearance is closely connected to its original function. It was designed for complex scientific work, including animal breeding and experiments. Its distinctive outer shell and technical systems were not simply decorative. They helped express the complicated and highly controlled activities taking place inside. The building stopped operating as a research facility in 2020, and its future use has become a subject of architectural debate. It was placed under heritage protection in 2023.
Another important example is St. Agnes Church in Kreuzberg. Designed by Werner Düttmann, it was built between 1964 and 1967. From the outside, it looks like a monumental, almost windowless concrete block. The architect deliberately avoided the familiar image of a traditional church. Instead, the building creates a quiet, enclosed atmosphere through its scale, simple forms and controlled use of light.
St. Agnes is no longer used as a parish church. After the congregation gave up the building, it was converted into an art gallery. This is an example of adaptive reuse: an existing building is given a new function while important parts of its original architecture are retained.
Berlin's architectural landscape also includes buildings that are sometimes grouped with Brutalism or post-war modernism, even when their materials and forms are different. The Bierpinsel, for example, is a striking tower with a tree-like silhouette. Kino International on Karl-Marx-Allee is another landmark of East Berlin's post-war architecture. These examples show why architectural styles are not always easy to define with one label.
Today, many Brutalist buildings are being reconsidered. Some people see them as unattractive, cold or intimidating. Others value their honesty, craftsmanship and strong visual identity. When a building is no longer needed for its original purpose, the question becomes whether it should be demolished, renovated or adapted for a new use. In Berlin, that debate is part of a larger discussion about memory, architecture and the future of the city.
The reading adds historical context to the video. Dates and building histories are based on Berlin heritage and architectural sources.
Check your understanding
Choose the correct answer according to the reading.
Words to describe architecture
Study these expressions from the video and the reading.
Concrete left visible without a decorative covering.
Visible, not covered or hidden.
Patterns left on concrete by the temporary molds used to shape it.
Very large, impressive and important in appearance.
A structure built to defend or protect a place.
Confident and direct, without trying to hide or soften something.
Concrete or mortar sprayed at high velocity onto a surface.
Giving an existing building a new purpose.
Something that preserves the appearance or atmosphere of an earlier period.
The act of pulling down or destroying a building.
The passive voice in architecture
When we describe buildings, we often focus on the building itself rather than the person who designed, constructed or transformed it. The passive voice is especially useful for this.
Form
Present simple passive: am / is / are + past participle
The building is made of concrete.
Past simple passive: was / were + past participle
St. Agnes Church was designed by Werner Düttmann.
Present perfect passive: has / have been + past participle
The building has been converted into an art gallery.
Modal passive: modal + be + past participle
These buildings should be protected.
Active or passive?
Compare these sentences:
- Active: Werner Düttmann designed St. Agnes Church.
- Passive: St. Agnes Church was designed by Werner Düttmann.
In the passive sentence, the building becomes the main focus. The person responsible can be added with by, but this is not always necessary.
Complete the sentences
Choose the correct passive form from the options.
Architecture: a matter of opinion
Use the vocabulary and grammar from this lesson to discuss the questions.
1. Which building in the video made the strongest impression on you? Describe its appearance.
2. Do you think the Mäusebunker should be preserved? What could it be used for in the future?
3. Is it important for a building to show its original function through its design?
4. Can a building be both unattractive and architecturally important?
5. Should governments spend public money preserving controversial architecture?
6. What kinds of buildings in your own city should be protected?
Sources and photo credits
Historical and architectural references:
Berlin State Monuments Office — Mäusebunker
Mäusebunker — building history and urban context
Berlin Heritage Database — St. Agnes
St. Agnes — parish history
Royal Institute of British Architects — Brutalism
Photographs are linked to their Wikimedia Commons file pages. Please retain the individual attribution and license links when publishing this lesson.
TCR English • Berlin architecture lesson